Data Elements Required
For Assay Validation
Both the USP and the ICH recognize that is it not always
necessary to evaluate every analytical performance parameter.
The type of method and its intended use dictates which
parameters need to be investigated, as illustrated in Table 1.
The USP divides analytical
methods into three separate categories:
- Quantitation of major
components or active ingredients.
- Determination of
impurities or degradation products.
- Determination of
performance characteristics.
For assays in category 1,
LOD and LOQ evaluations are not necessary because the major
component or active ingredient to be measured is normally
present at high levels. However, since quantitative information
is desired, all of the remaining analytical performance
parameters are pertinent. Assays in category 2 are divided into
two sub-categories: Quantitative and Limit Tests. If
quantitative information is desired, a determination of LOD is
not necessary, but the remaining parameters are required. The
situation reverses itself for a Limit Test. Since quantitation
is not required, it is sufficient to measure the LOD and
demonstrate specificity and ruggedness.
Table 1: USP Data Elements Required For Assay Validation
|
The parameters that must be
documented for methods in USP assay category 3 are dependent
upon the nature of the test. Dissolution testing, for example,
falls into this category. The ICH treats analytical methods in
much the same manner, as shown in Table 2.
USP categories 1 and 2
match the ICH categories of Assay and Impurity Testing,
respectively, and the corresponding discussion above still
applies.
Table 2:
ICH Validation Characteristics Versus
Type of Analytical Procedure
The ICH has
not yet chosen to specifically address methods for performance
characteristics (USP category 3), however, but has instead
addressed analytical methods for compound identification. In
this ICH category, it is only necessary to prove that the method
is specific for the compound being identified.
|